Been thinking about the rear bumer a lot lately, with a mind on how the factory rear bumper has a hitch-structure in it good for 3500#, but when adding a proper hitch this heavy component becomes redundant. It doesn't even do a good job with that rear bumper, the bumper bends and contacts the body too easily (as mine was when I bought it, which I fixed, then backed into an immovable object and bent it right back again). Plus the hitch hangs down.
I was randomly browsing and saw that Curt sells a hitch for RVs that has a 2.5" OD 2.0" ID crosstube that is 68.5" wide. It's meant to be installed with adjustable flanges that then are tightened down or welded down at the right width. I got under the truck and took some measurments of the factory hitch and checked spare tire clearances:
Tape measure housing is 3.5". what I concluded is that the Curt 68.5" crossbar is just a smidge narrower than our rear bumper, and if the factory flanges had the factory hitch crossbar cut free of them, the Curt crossbar would barely clear under the quarter panels.
I had looked at the ARB Navara rear bumper, it's not as high as a true high-clearance bumper, but it is about 2" higher than the OE hitch. Basically the drawbar would sit where that factory structural crossbar on the rear bumper sits.
This got me thinking about the large gap between the ARB bumper and the back of the truck, and the gap that would be present if this Curt hitch were used in the fashion i'm thinking. This leaves room for swingouts, where the swingouts hinges tuck deep inside, allowing for some creative engineering to let them swing and stay close to the truck even when open, to avoid interfering with say, a trailer.
This is what I came up with:
The idea is to use .120 wall DOM 1" tubing bent in such a fashion that it results in three dimensions of material, to increase strength without adding a whole bunch of weight. If I've done the calcs on the tubing itself correctly then I've added less than 50# over just the Curt hitch itself, irrespective of the spare and fuel cans themselves obviously.
We'll see if I try to build this or not. If I can make this work then it might not come in any worse than the factory rear bumper and hitch setup when it comes to weight.
I was randomly browsing and saw that Curt sells a hitch for RVs that has a 2.5" OD 2.0" ID crosstube that is 68.5" wide. It's meant to be installed with adjustable flanges that then are tightened down or welded down at the right width. I got under the truck and took some measurments of the factory hitch and checked spare tire clearances:
Tape measure housing is 3.5". what I concluded is that the Curt 68.5" crossbar is just a smidge narrower than our rear bumper, and if the factory flanges had the factory hitch crossbar cut free of them, the Curt crossbar would barely clear under the quarter panels.
I had looked at the ARB Navara rear bumper, it's not as high as a true high-clearance bumper, but it is about 2" higher than the OE hitch. Basically the drawbar would sit where that factory structural crossbar on the rear bumper sits.
This got me thinking about the large gap between the ARB bumper and the back of the truck, and the gap that would be present if this Curt hitch were used in the fashion i'm thinking. This leaves room for swingouts, where the swingouts hinges tuck deep inside, allowing for some creative engineering to let them swing and stay close to the truck even when open, to avoid interfering with say, a trailer.
This is what I came up with:
The idea is to use .120 wall DOM 1" tubing bent in such a fashion that it results in three dimensions of material, to increase strength without adding a whole bunch of weight. If I've done the calcs on the tubing itself correctly then I've added less than 50# over just the Curt hitch itself, irrespective of the spare and fuel cans themselves obviously.
We'll see if I try to build this or not. If I can make this work then it might not come in any worse than the factory rear bumper and hitch setup when it comes to weight.