![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Register | Home | Forum | Gallery | Active Topics | Register | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
Nismo Stock Suspension 2wd Vs 4wd Ride Height.
I Had My Truck Next To A 2wd At The Dealer Today And Was Surprised At How Much Higher It Was At The Frame/mudflaps/etc. I Run Bfg Muds And The Tread Lugs Are Deeper And Im Pretty Sure They Run Taller Than The Rugged Trails But Not 2inches Higher-my Truck Up Front And At The Front Of Frame Was A Good 2inches Higher-the Rear Wasnt As High Prob Because My Stock Rear Springs Have Seemed To Flatten Slightly. Maybe It Is The Tires? Or Is There Really A Difference In The Springs/coils? Cause I Cant Imagine Bfg Muds Are That Much Bigger Than Rugged Trails?
__________________
CALMINI sucks! ![]() ![]() ![]() |
| Sponsored Links | ||
| ||
|
|
|
||||
|
nissan lists the trucks as being the same height, 70.1 inches
__________________
2007 SE CC in Radiant Silver. Kenwood HU with Direct Sirius, JBL 6x9's, JBL 6.5's, Kicker 10" CVT in custom box, Lund Avenger bug shield, SilverStar Ultra SU's, dark tint all around. |
|
||||
|
Yeah I See What Your Saying But My Truck Was Definitely 1 To A Good 2 Inches Taller At The Top Of The Vehicle To And As Described But Not So Much Towards The Rear Of Truck Bed.
it just surprises me to see the 4x4 that much higher from what i could see, and i dont see it being from my tires. i just always thought they were the same height. and i cant imagine my vision is that bad so maybe it is the tires.
__________________
CALMINI sucks! ![]() ![]() ![]() Last edited by toyniss : 04-20-2008 at 04:05 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost |
| Sponsored Links | ||
| ||
|
|