hennessy camaro vs gt500 - Nissan Frontier / Navara Forum
Nissan Frontier Forum Nissan Frontier Forum
 

» Auto Insurance

» Featured Product
» Wheel & Tire Center

Go Back   Nissan Frontier / Navara Forum > Nissan Frontier Forums > Off Topic
Register for an account

Please Visit our Site Sponsors
ClubFrontier.org is the premier Nissan Frontier Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 10-25-2009, 01:05 AM
NissanTy's Avatar
Shift_Obsessed
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Maryland
Posts: 5,776
Thanks: 32
Thanked 72 Times in 70 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Send a message via AIM to NissanTy
hennessy camaro vs gt500

YouTube - Brute Force: Ford Shelby GT500 v Hennessey Camaro

im a ford guy but that is one BAD camaro, plus the camaro looks sweet.
__________________
2004 XE KC V6 4X4
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 10-25-2009, 03:39 AM
roastbeef's Avatar
Shift_Obsessed
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: orange county
Posts: 11,854
Thanks: 85
Thanked 974 Times in 695 Posts
Garage
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
sucks you have to put that much money into those cars just to be a few tenths of a second faster than an '09 m3.
and then those cars have to try to turn.
__________________
what one man can do, another can do.

pain of discipline.
pain of regret.
take your pick.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 10-25-2009, 07:32 AM
DAYNE's Avatar
Shift_Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 332
Thanks: 13
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Feedback Score: 2 reviews
They look good, better than anything from the last 2 designs. I think the new challenger looks more muscle-ey than these 2 though. Look at NCIS LA....there's a sweet black challenger they cruise in. Looks like a modern muscle car, more than these 2.
__________________


2006 Crew Cab SE Auto 2WD......and yes a Ford too
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 10-25-2009, 12:22 PM
Mylt1's Avatar
Shift_Obsessed
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,899
Thanks: 0
Thanked 236 Times in 196 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Quote:
Originally Posted by DAYNE View Post
They look good, better than anything from the last 2 designs. I think the new challenger looks more muscle-ey than these 2 though. Look at NCIS LA....there's a sweet black challenger they cruise in. Looks like a modern muscle car, more than these 2.
they do look nice. to bad there dog a$$ slow. the more i see the new camaros the more i want one.
__________________
05 LE CC 4X4. SUPER BLACK
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 10-25-2009, 12:45 PM
JBMX's Avatar
Shift_Hardcore
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Elma, NY
Posts: 1,164
Thanks: 455
Thanked 56 Times in 49 Posts
Feedback Score: 3 reviews
Send a message via AIM to JBMX Send a message via Yahoo to JBMX
Love the new shelby.
__________________

2008 SE 4x4 CC - SOLD


Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 10-26-2009, 08:40 PM
Mainerunr's Avatar
Shift_Obsessed
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: maine
Posts: 5,583
Thanks: 37
Thanked 127 Times in 102 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
beef, skidpad numbers on the E46 M3 arent that great either, in fact, I've seen at least one review that showed the mustang above 0.90 while I havent found any above 0.89 for the bimmer. (then again, I havent spent that much time looked and I found the mustang one while looking up numbers for the 370z...)
__________________
'05 Storm Gray SE CC 4x4, 6M. PRG 2" f/r, OEM fogs/skids, 265/75r16 Yokohama Geolandar AT/S, stubbie antenna. (GONE)
'11 F150, Ingot Silver XLT Off-Road Supercrew.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 10-26-2009, 10:16 PM
NissanTy's Avatar
Shift_Obsessed
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Maryland
Posts: 5,776
Thanks: 32
Thanked 72 Times in 70 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Send a message via AIM to NissanTy
i love bmws and love the m3 and m5 but no way is it a better bargain then these 2 cars. as i agree they aren't as fast as they should be i kind of blame that on the drivers of the cars, no way will a car with over 500 hp run a 13 sec 1/4 mile.
__________________
2004 XE KC V6 4X4
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 10-27-2009, 03:42 AM
Shift_Hardcore
Lifetime Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: hanford CA/ San Diego CA
Posts: 1,379
Thanks: 32
Thanked 17 Times in 17 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
i want the new camaro!....
__________________
2011 Camaro SS/RS (my new baby)
2004 XE 2.4l I-4(Sold)
part of The Lifted XE Club!
F.W.O West Coast Chapter

MODS: Calmini Front and rear prerunner bumpers,Total Chaos Long Travel Kit, Shock Hoops, Fox 2.5 coil overs w/ eitbach springs, Fiberglass Fenders, Dever progessive add a leafs, Panasonic CQ-C7303U Clarion 4 channel 400W amp pushing a set of JL audio 6.5 Compents, MA Audio 400w 2 channel amp pushing Kicker Comp 10", XM Radio, Magnaflow 2 1/4 in/out dumped before the axle. 5% tint on rear windows 35% on front windows. 2 guage a-pilar. calmini Bed mounted light bard
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 10-27-2009, 05:12 AM
roastbeef's Avatar
Shift_Obsessed
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: orange county
Posts: 11,854
Thanks: 85
Thanked 974 Times in 695 Posts
Garage
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mainerunr View Post
beef, skidpad numbers on the E46 M3 arent that great either, in fact, I've seen at least one review that showed the mustang above 0.90 while I havent found any above 0.89 for the bimmer. (then again, I havent spent that much time looked and I found the mustang one while looking up numbers for the 370z...)
skid numbers can sometimes be deceptive. be sure when comparing skid ratings that the diameter is the same. also, tire type and road surface temp can also drasticly effect the numbers.

out of all the "top of the line" american muscle cars, the stang definitely seems to have the best numbers.
2010 Chevrolet Camaro SS vs. 2009 Dodge Challenger SRT8 vs. 2009 Ford Shelby GT500 Comparison Test on Inside Line
an '09 135i produces similar numbers, and it isn't really a "specialty" vehicle.
2008 BMW 135i Coupe Full Test

watched a video of an edmunds review of an '09 m3 vert (typically about 300 more lbs over the coupes) that had a .95 lateral skid rating.
__________________
what one man can do, another can do.

pain of discipline.
pain of regret.
take your pick.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 10-27-2009, 11:41 AM
08_Nismo's Avatar
Shift_Obsessed
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Mechanicsville, MD
Posts: 3,271
Thanks: 76
Thanked 134 Times in 122 Posts
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mainerunr View Post
beef, skidpad numbers on the E46 M3 arent that great either, in fact, I've seen at least one review that showed the mustang above 0.90 while I havent found any above 0.89 for the bimmer. (then again, I havent spent that much time looked and I found the mustang one while looking up numbers for the 370z...)
the E46 M3 is an older car, look up the E92 and the numbers are a good bit different.

The E92 is such a sexy a$s car.
__________________



2008 NISMO CC
PRG 2"/1.5" PRG lift,DIY 2" bodylift, 33"x11.5" BFG KM2s, bed liner on rims, flowmaster muffler/removed secondary cats/blacked out exhaust, AFE Intake, White Rhino light bar with KC long range lights, custom NISMO decals, full rebuilt sound system that can blow ear drums
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  Nissan Frontier / Navara Forum > Nissan Frontier Forums > Off Topic



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.2

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:45 PM.



Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2
Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.